Charger 3.6L GT vs 03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
250
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5040 mm
4697
1905 mm
1843
1479 mm
1448
3052 mm
2730
455 L
/
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
14.3
70 L
/
9.3 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
front row seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
292 BHP - 797 BHP
265 - 265
Automatic
8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
300 BHP
265 BHP
358 Nm
380
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Charger 3.6L GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCharger 3.6L GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Charger 3.6L GT if you care more about price; choose 03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Charger 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while 03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, 03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Charger 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 3052 mm, while 03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus has a wheelbase of 2730. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Charger 3.6L GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Charger 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive, while 03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus uses All Wheel Drive.