Charger 5.7L R/T vs Accord 1.5L EXL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5040 mm
4970 mm
1905 mm
1860 mm
1480 mm
1450 mm
3052 mm
2830 mm
455 L
570 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
8.1 Km/L
11 Km/L
70 L
60 L
8.1 Km/L
11 Km/L
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
1.5 L - 3.5 L
292 BHP - 797 BHP
173 BHP - 278 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Engine
5.7 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
370 BHP
192 BHP
536 Nm
260 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
Charger 5.7L R/T
Accord 1.5L EXL
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- Smooth and safe driving experience
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Screen technologies and user interface need to be improved
- Traditional exterior design lacks innovation
- Off-road performance affects comfort
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCharger 5.7L R/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Charger 5.7L R/T if you care more about price; choose Accord 1.5L EXL if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Charger 5.7L R/T has a fuel consumption of 12.35, while Accord 1.5L EXL has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Accord 1.5L EXL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Charger 5.7L R/T has a wheelbase of 3052 mm, while Accord 1.5L EXL has a wheelbase of 2830 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Charger 5.7L R/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Charger 5.7L R/T uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Accord 1.5L EXL uses Front Wheel Drive.