Charger 6.4L R/T Scatpack vs Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
281 km/h
220 km/h
/
6
/
3598 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5088 mm
5039 mm
1885 mm
1905 mm
1480 mm
1486 mm
3052 mm
3048 mm
461 L
467 L
/
4 Doors
/
132 m
Fuel Economy
7.9 Km/L
14 Km/L
72 L
70 L
7.9 Km/L
14 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
292 BHP - 797 BHP
292 BHP - 797 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
6.4 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
485 BHP
300 BHP
637 Nm
358 Nm
/
V
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Charger 6.4L R/T Scatpack
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Charger 6.4L R/T Scatpack if you care more about price; choose Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Charger 6.4L R/T Scatpack has a fuel consumption of 12.66, while Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Charger 6.4L R/T Scatpack has a wheelbase of 3052 mm, while Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition has a wheelbase of 3048 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Charger 6.4L R/T Scatpack, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Charger 6.4L R/T Scatpack uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Charger GT 3.6L V6 Black Edition uses All Wheel Drive.