Charger R/T 5.7L vs Model 3 Performance All-Wheel Drive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
261 km/h
8
/
5690 cc
/
GCC
American
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5309 mm
4720 mm
1905 mm
2089 mm
1486 mm
1431 mm
3048 mm
2875 mm
467 L
682 L
132 m
138 m
Fuel Economy
6 Km/L
/
70 L
/
6 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Bucket
Sports
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8.4
15.4
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
17
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
0.0 L
292 BHP - 797 BHP
261 BHP - 513 BHP
Automatic
AT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Electric
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
V
/
5.7 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
4
/
370 BHP
513 BHP
536 Nm
660 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Motor
/
8.15
/
options.Lithium-Ion
Comparison of configuration highlights
Charger R/T 5.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Model 3 Performance All-Wheel Drive
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- Outstanding driving and acceleration performance
- Advanced technology and intelligent user experience
- High efficiency and environmental sustainability
Negative
- Manufacturing quality needs to be improved
- Less comfortable seats on long flights
- Customer service experience may not always be consistent
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Charger R/T 5.7L if you care more about price; choose Model 3 Performance All-Wheel Drive if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Charger R/T 5.7L has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while Model 3 Performance All-Wheel Drive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Charger R/T 5.7L has a wheelbase of 3048 mm, while Model 3 Performance All-Wheel Drive has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Charger R/T 5.7L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Charger R/T 5.7L uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Model 3 Performance All-Wheel Drive uses All Wheel Drive.