Ciciv LX vs K4 1.6L LX STD-11 Comparison

Car Information

9.5

/

112

/

181

/

Engine / Motor

200

/

/

1.6 Liter

Dimensions

5

5

4689

4710

1801

1850

1415

1435

2735

/

Fuel Economy

47

47

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Tilt & Telescopic Adjustable Steering Colum

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

cloth and leather

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

2

/

/

/

/

Front & Back Warning System

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

4

/

/

/

12.3

/

Transmission

Automatic

6 Speed AT

/

6 Speed AT

Chassis & Steering

/

MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

225/45 R17

/

225/45 R17

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

-

123 BHP - 180 BHP

121 BHP - 190

Automatic & CVT

6 Speed AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

1.6L

Gasoline

Gasoline

150

121 BHP

112

/

6400

/

181

/

5000

15.4 Kg.m

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ciciv LX

    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Collision Safety Cut-Out
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Collision Detection
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • K4 1.6L LX STD-11

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • High fuel efficiency
  • Long lasting reliability
  • High quality interior design

Negative

  • Limited rear space for passengers
  • Average off road performance
  • An insufficiently innovative infotainment system

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCiciv LX

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Ciciv LX if you care more about price; choose K4 1.6L LX STD-11 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Honda | Ciciv LX

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi H5 Flagship

Honda | Ciciv LX

VS

Honda | Ciciv SPORT

Honda | Ciciv LX

VS

Mazda | Mazda 6 2024 2.5L V w/ Sunroof

Honda | Ciciv LX

VS

MG | MG7 1.5T DEL

Honda | Ciciv LX

VS

Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2021 Super

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Ciciv LX has a fuel consumption of No data, while K4 1.6L LX STD-11 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Ciciv LX has a wheelbase of 2735, while K4 1.6L LX STD-11 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ciciv LX uses No data, while K4 1.6L LX STD-11 uses No data.