Ciciv SPORT vs City DX 1.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4689
4553 mm
1801
1748 mm
1415
1476 mm
,735
2650 mm
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
47
40 L
/
13 Km/L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
123 BHP - 180 BHP
118 BHP - 119
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
119 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
145 Nm
5000
/
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
City DX 1.5L
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCity DX 1.5L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about power; choose City DX 1.5L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data, while City DX 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735, while City DX 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2650 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, City DX 1.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ciciv SPORT uses No data, while City DX 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.