Ciciv SPORT vs Toyota Camry 2018 2.5L SE (178 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
195
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4689
4885
1801
1840
1415
1445
,735
2824
/
427
Fuel Economy
47
60
/
14.7
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
123 BHP - 180 BHP
176 BHP - 298 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
178 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
231
5000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Toyota Camry 2018 2.5L SE (178 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Toyota Camry 2018 2.5L SE (178 HP) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Toyota Camry 2018 2.5L SE (178 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735, while Toyota Camry 2018 2.5L SE (178 HP) has a wheelbase of 2824. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Camry 2018 2.5L SE (178 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ciciv SPORT uses No data, while Toyota Camry 2018 2.5L SE (178 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.