Ciciv SPORT vs Volkswagen Jetta 2017 2.0 SE Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
193
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4689
4659
1801
1774
1415
1453
,735
2651
/
510
Fuel Economy
47
55
/
11.5
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
123 BHP - 180 BHP
115 BHP - 170 BHP
Automatic & CVT
7 Speed DSG Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
115 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
170
5000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Volkswagen Jetta 2017 2.0 SE
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVolkswagen Jetta 2017 2.0 SE
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about power; choose Volkswagen Jetta 2017 2.0 SE if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Volkswagen Jetta 2017 2.0 SE has a fuel consumption of 8.7. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735, while Volkswagen Jetta 2017 2.0 SE has a wheelbase of 2651. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Volkswagen Jetta 2017 2.0 SE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ciciv SPORT uses No data, while Volkswagen Jetta 2017 2.0 SE uses Front Wheel Drive.