CLS 450 4MATIC vs Cadenza 3.3L GDi Top Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
235 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
4
5 Seater
✓
/
4998
4970 mm
1890
1870 mm
1435
1470 mm
2939
2855 mm
520
451 L
Fuel Economy
8.5
10.6 Km/L
80
70 L
/
10.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0
3.3 L - 3.5 L
367 BHP
266 BHP - 294 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
367 BHP
284 BHP
500
336 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CLS 450 4MATIC
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Cadenza 3.3L GDi Top
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCadenza 3.3L GDi Top
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Cadenza 3.3L GDi Top if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Cadenza 3.3L GDi Top has a fuel consumption of 9.43. Therefore, Cadenza 3.3L GDi Top is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2939, while Cadenza 3.3L GDi Top has a wheelbase of 2855 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CLS 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CLS 450 4MATIC uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Cadenza 3.3L GDi Top uses Front Wheel Drive.