CarteaCompare CarsCLS 450 4MATIC vs Seal 6 Design

CLS 450 4MATIC vs Seal 6 Design Comparison

Car Information

4.8

/

/

210

/

5.9

/

11.75

Engine / Motor

250

180

6

/

Dimensions

4

5

/

4998

4830

1890

1875

1435

1495

2939

2790

520

491

/

1630

/

4

Fuel Economy

8.5

16.95

80

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

12.8"

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

3.3

Transmission

/

Automatic

eCVT

Chassis & Steering

/

Rear Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

3.0

1.5

367 BHP

174

Automatic

eCVT

Gasoline

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

4

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

367 BHP

174

500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Lithium iron phosphate battery

/

161

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CLS 450 4MATIC

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Seal 6 Design

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSeal 6 Design

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | CLS 450 4MATIC

VS

Maserati | Quattroporte 3.0T V6 GT

Mercedes Benz | CLS 450 4MATIC

VS

Maserati | Maserati Quattroporte 2023 3.0T V6 GT

Mercedes Benz | CLS 450 4MATIC

VS

Maserati | Maserati Quattroporte 2024 3.0T V6 GT

Mercedes Benz | CLS 450 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Panamera 2020 4 E-Hybrid

Mercedes Benz | CLS 450 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Panamera 2019 4 E-Hybrid

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9. Therefore, Seal 6 Design is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2939, while Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CLS 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CLS 450 4MATIC uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive.