Commander Overland vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185
/
3
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
/
4.314
/
1.809
/
1.624
/
2.585
/
448
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0
1.3 L - 1.5 L
272
112 BHP - 168
TBD
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.3 L
Gasoline
Petrol
272
160 BHP
400
230
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Commander Overland
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCommander Overland
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Commander Overland if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Commander Overland has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Commander Overland has a wheelbase of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Commander Overland uses No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.