Creta 1.5 GLS IVT vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4315
4.275
1790
1.765
1630
1.535
2610
2.570
200
/
/
240
Fuel Economy
/
15.4
40
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
Interior
✓
/
10.25
/
LCD
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
IVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
McPherson Strut
/
Coupled Torsion Beam Axles
/
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 1.6 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
113 BHP - 138 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
6MT & AT & Automatic & CVT & IVT
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
115 BHP
148 BHP
140
192
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
Creta 1.5 GLS IVT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- A sophisticated and easy to use entertainment system
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Higher price compared to some competitors
- Average sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCreta 1.5 GLS IVT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Creta 1.5 GLS IVT if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Creta 1.5 GLS IVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Creta 1.5 GLS IVT has a wheelbase of 2610, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Creta 1.5 GLS IVT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Creta 1.5 GLS IVT uses No data, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.