Crossland X 1.2T Innovation vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
187 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4211 mm
4341 mm
1765 mm
1804 mm
1605 mm
1693 mm
2604 mm
2676 mm
410 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
20.8 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
45 L
50 L
20.8 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.2 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
110 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.2 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
115 BHP
205 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Crossland X 1.2T Innovation
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCrossland X 1.2T Innovation
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Crossland X 1.2T Innovation if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Crossland X 1.2T Innovation has a fuel consumption of 4.81, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Crossland X 1.2T Innovation is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Crossland X 1.2T Innovation has a wheelbase of 2604 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Crossland X 1.2T Innovation uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.