Crossland X 1.2T Innovation vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
187 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4211 mm
4490 mm
1765 mm
1874 mm
1605 mm
1613 mm
2604 mm
2750 mm
410 L
/
Fuel Economy
20.8 Km/L
/
45 L
/
20.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.2 L
/
110 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
110 BHP
305 BHP
205 Nm
680 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Crossland X 1.2T Innovation
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Crossland X 1.2T Innovation if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Crossland X 1.2T Innovation has a fuel consumption of 4.81, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Crossland X 1.2T Innovation has a wheelbase of 2604 mm, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Crossland X 1.2T Innovation uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.