CS35 Plus Limited vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
/
4335
4.275
1825
1.765
1660
1.535
2600
2.570
/
240
Fuel Economy
17.3
15.4
53
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
7 Inches LCD
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver, Passenger, Side & Curtain
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25 Inch
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
DCT
/
7
/
DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Electric
/
Wheels/brakes
225/45 R18
/
225/45 R18
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 1.4 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
156 BHP - 158 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
DCT
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
156 BHP
148 BHP
260
192
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
CS35 Plus Limited
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CS35 Plus Limited if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CS35 Plus Limited has a fuel consumption of 5.78, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, CS35 Plus Limited is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CS35 Plus Limited has a wheelbase of 2600, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS35 Plus Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CS35 Plus Limited uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.