CX-30 Elite vs Atto 3 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5
18"
215/60R17
4395
4455
1795
1875
1540
1615
2655
2720
/
5 Doors
/
310
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
16.1
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
Rear View Camera
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
5
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dynamic Stability Control & Traction
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
8
6
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Multi-Link
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
153 HP - 155 BHP
201 BHP
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
AT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
420 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Dual Exhaust - Chrome
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
/
Gasoline
Electric
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
153 HP
201 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
310 Nm
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-30 Elite
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Atto 3 Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-30 Elite if you care more about price; choose Atto 3 Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-30 Elite has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Atto 3 Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-30 Elite has a wheelbase of 2655, while Atto 3 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 3 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-30 Elite uses No data, while Atto 3 Comfort uses Front Drive.