CX-30 TREND vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

/

8 s

/

189

/

390

/

4810*1925*1742

Dimensions

5

7

18"

19

4395

4810

1795

1925

1540

1742

2655

2800

Fuel Economy

16.1

13

48

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Rear View Camera

/

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

10.25

/

/

10.25"

/

Driver Seat

/

Triple

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Dynamic Stability Control & Traction

/

/

/

/

/

6

Infotainment

/

/

/

8

8

/

15.6

/

Battery/Charging

/

4

Transmission

/

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

-

153 HP - 155 BHP

254 - 254

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Dual Exhaust - Chrome

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

2.0L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

2.0T GDI

153 HP

254

153 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

200

390

200 NM @ 4000 RPM

/

/

Turbocharge

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

19 ADAS Functions

/

/

Eco + Normal + Sport

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-30 TREND

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Tiggo 9 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-30 TREND

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-30 TREND if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mazda | CX-30 TREND

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-30 TREND has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, CX-30 TREND is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-30 TREND has a wheelbase of 2655, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-30 TREND uses No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.