CX-30 TREND vs T2 i-DM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200
/
4
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5
18"
/
4395
4785
1795
2006
1540
1875
2655
2800
/
5
/
752
/
220
Fuel Economy
16.1
18.5
48
70 L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Rear View Camera
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dynamic Stability Control & Traction
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
8
12
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
✓
/
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode
DHT
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5
153 HP - 155 BHP
154 BHP - 600
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
3DHT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Exhaust - Chrome
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
153 HP
154 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
220
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-30 TREND
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
T2 i-DM
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High fuel efficiency
- Efficient hybrid propulsion system
Negative
- Luggage compartment space is limited
- Lack of digital entertainment options
- Traction ability is not the best in its class
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-30 TREND if you care more about overall equipment; choose T2 i-DM if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-30 TREND has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while T2 i-DM has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, T2 i-DM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-30 TREND has a wheelbase of 2655, while T2 i-DM has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T2 i-DM, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-30 TREND uses No data, while T2 i-DM uses Four Wheel Drive.