CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI vs BYD Ti7 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
Dimensions
5
5
235/50 R20
19"
4740
5016
1890
1995
1688
1865
2870
2920
/
2425
/
1800L
/
5.7
/
190
/
24
/
25
Fuel Economy
15.4
/
58
60
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Rear View Camera
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
All Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
PU
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Speed Alert DSA: Display Only
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
54
/
6.6
Transmission
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
AWD
/
Double wishbone type
/
Five-link
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated
/
Ventilated
/
60 /255 R19
/
60 /255 R19
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
1.5T / PHEV
280 HP - 284 BHP
480
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
5
Exterior
Piano Black Honey-Comb
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear Bumper Guard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.3L
1.5T / PHEV
Hybrid
Hybrid
Turbocharge
/
e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)
/
280 HP
480
284 PS @ 5000 RPM
/
450
630
450 NM @ 2000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport / Normal / Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
BYD Ti7 Design
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Lane Following Assist
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
- Remote Central Door Locking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI if you care more about overall equipment; choose BYD Ti7 Design if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while BYD Ti7 Design has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while BYD Ti7 Design has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BYD Ti7 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while BYD Ti7 Design uses Four-Wheel Drive.