CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI vs CRV Touring (AWD) 2025 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7
235/50 R20
/
4740
4706 mm
1890
1866 mm
1688
1681 mm
2870
2700 mm
/
5 Doors
/
375 L
Fuel Economy
15.4
11 Km/L
58
58 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Rear View Camera
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Speed Alert DSA: Display Only
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
280 HP - 284 BHP
184 BHP - 190
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
Piano Black Honey-Comb
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear Bumper Guard
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
3.3L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)
/
280 HP
190 BHP
284 PS @ 5000 RPM
/
450
243 Nm
450 NM @ 2000 RPM
/
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
CRV Touring (AWD) 2025
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI if you care more about price; choose CRV Touring (AWD) 2025 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while CRV Touring (AWD) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while CRV Touring (AWD) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CRV Touring (AWD) 2025 uses All Wheel Drive.