CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI vs CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
235/50 R20
/
4740
5075 mm
1890
1969 mm
1688
1716 mm
2870
2930 mm
/
407 L
Fuel Economy
15.4
11.8 Km/L
58
74 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Rear View Camera
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Speed Alert DSA: Display Only
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
280 HP - 284 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
Piano Black Honey-Comb
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear Bumper Guard
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.3L
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)
/
280 HP
230 BHP
284 PS @ 5000 RPM
/
450
420 Nm
450 NM @ 2000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI if you care more about fuel economy; choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.