CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI vs CX90 High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3289 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
235/50 R20
/
4740
5100 mm
1890
1994 mm
1688
1745 mm
2870
3010 mm
/
5 Doors
/
566 L
/
201 m
Fuel Economy
15.4
10.5 Km/L
58
71 L
/
10.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear View Camera
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Vinyl Upholstery
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Speed Alert DSA: Display Only
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
8
8
/
9.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
Transmission
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
3.3 L - 3.3 L
280 HP - 284 BHP
340 HP - 345 BHP
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
6 - 8
Exterior
Piano Black Honey-Comb
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear Bumper Guard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
3.3L
3.3 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)
/
280 HP
345 BHP
284 PS @ 5000 RPM
/
450
500 Nm
450 NM @ 2000 RPM
/
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
CX90 High Plus
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI if you care more about price; choose CX90 High Plus if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while CX90 High Plus has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while CX90 High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX90 High Plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CX90 High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.