CarteaCompare CarsCX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI vs EMKOO 1.5 GE

CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI vs EMKOO 1.5 GE Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

5

5

235/50 R20

18

4740

4680

1890

1901

1688

1670

2870

2750

Fuel Economy

15.4

/

58

/

Comfort

/

Rear View Camera

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7 Inch LCD

/

Passenger Seat

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake

/

/

Speed Alert DSA: Display Only

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

All Seats

Infotainment

/

/

8

6

/

10.25 Inch

/

/

Transmission

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE

DCT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

/

McPherson Suspension

/

Multi-link Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

Key Spec

3.3 L - 3.3 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

280 HP - 284 BHP

138 BHP - 177 BHP

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic

Automatic & DCT & DHT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 7 Seater

5 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

Piano Black Honey-Comb

/

/

/

Rear Bumper Guard

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

3.3L

1.5 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)

/

280 HP

140 BHP

284 PS @ 5000 RPM

/

450

/

450 NM @ 2000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • EMKOO 1.5 GE

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Spare Wheel
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEMKOO 1.5 GE

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI if you care more about interior space; choose EMKOO 1.5 GE if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI

VS

Honda | CRV Touring (AWD) 2025

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI

VS

Kia | Kia Telluride 2023 3.8L V6 EX (AWD)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI

VS

Kia | Kia Sorento 2024 3.5L EX1 (AWD)

Mazda | CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI

VS

Maxus | D90 Pro Executive Luxury 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while EMKOO 1.5 GE has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while EMKOO 1.5 GE has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EMKOO 1.5 GE uses No data.