CarteaCompare CarsCX5 2.5L GL (FWD) vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

200 km/h

/

4

/

2490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4550 mm

4680 mm

1840 mm

1840 mm

1670 mm

1725 mm

2700 mm

2706 mm

965 L

550 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

14.7 Km/L

15.6 Km/L

58 L

60 L

14.7 Km/L

15.6 Km/L

Comfort

/

Safety

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.9 L - 2.5 L

2.5 L

151 BHP - 188 BHP

132 BHP - 188 BHP

6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic

Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

Engine

2.5 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

188 BHP

188 BHP

251 Nm

244 Nm

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX5 2.5L GL (FWD)

    • ABS
  • XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
  • Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
  • High safety equipment increases confidence while driving

Negative

  • Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX5 2.5L GL (FWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) if you care more about price; choose XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX5 2.5L GL (FWD)

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

Mazda | CX5 2.5L GL (FWD)

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

Mazda | CX5 2.5L GL (FWD)

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

Mazda | CX5 2.5L GL (FWD)

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

Mazda | CX5 2.5L GL (FWD)

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2706 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 2.5L GL (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.