CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) vs Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) Comparison
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4550 mm
4856
1840 mm
1926
1675 mm
1900
2700 mm
2800
506 L
750
Fuel Economy
14.3 Km/L
9.1
58 L
90
14.3 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
2.0 L
151 BHP - 188 BHP
214 - 251 BHP
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
188 BHP
248 BHP
251 Nm
355
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX5 2.5L GT (AWD)
- ABS
Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) if you care more about price; choose Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) uses All Wheel Drive.