CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs HS5 Basic 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075 mm
4760 mm
1969 mm
1907 mm
1716 mm
1700 mm
2930 mm
2870 mm
407 L
453 L
/
4 Doors
/
130 m
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
7.1 Km/L
74 L
64 L
11.8 Km/L
7.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
221 BHP - 252 BHP
Automatic
8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230 BHP
221 BHP
420 Nm
340 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
HS5 Basic 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose HS5 Basic 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while HS5 Basic 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.