CarteaCompare CarsCX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs TXL Luxury 2.0T

CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs TXL Luxury 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

5075 mm

4780 mm

1969 mm

1885 mm

1716 mm

1730 mm

2930 mm

2800 mm

407 L

450 L

/

5 Doors

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

11.8 Km/L

14 Km/L

74 L

55 L

11.8 Km/L

14 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.7 L

1.6 L - 2.0 L

226 BHP - 273 BHP

197 BHP - 261 BHP

Automatic

8AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

230 BHP

261 BHP

420 Nm

400 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • TXL Luxury 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX9 2.5T GS (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about price; choose TXL Luxury 2.0T if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)

VS

Exeed | TXL Luxury 2.0T

Mazda | CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 2.0T-GDI Luxury (4WD)

Mazda | CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 2.0T-GDI Luxury (4WD)

Mazda | CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2021 2.0T Comfort

Mazda | CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 5008 2024 1.6T Allure

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while TXL Luxury 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, TXL Luxury 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while TXL Luxury 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while TXL Luxury 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.