CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs Kia Niro 2024 1.6L HEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
172
/
4
Dimensions
7 Seater
/
5075 mm
4335
1969 mm
1805
1716 mm
1545
2930 mm
2700
407 L
421
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
76.9
74 L
45
11.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
1.6 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
139 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
230 BHP
139 BHP
420 Nm
147
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Kia Niro 2024 1.6L HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickKia Niro 2024 1.6L HEV
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Kia Niro 2024 1.6L HEV if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Kia Niro 2024 1.6L HEV has a fuel consumption of 1.3. Therefore, Kia Niro 2024 1.6L HEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while Kia Niro 2024 1.6L HEV has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Kia Niro 2024 1.6L HEV uses Front Wheel Drive.