CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
170 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075 mm
4695 mm
1969 mm
1800 mm
1716 mm
1710 mm
2930 mm
2670 mm
407 L
463 L
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
62.5 Km/L
74 L
43 L
11.8 Km/L
62.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2.4 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
236 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
230 BHP
236 BHP
420 Nm
300 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about price; choose Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a fuel consumption of 1.6. Therefore, Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline uses All Wheel Drive.