CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs Tiggo 7 CSH Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5075 mm
4553
1969 mm
1862
1716 mm
1696
2930 mm
2670
407 L
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
41.7
74 L
/
11.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Driver Seat
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
/
DHT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
1.5L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
204
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
230 BHP
204
420 Nm
365
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
6.6
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo 7 CSH
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 7 CSH
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 7 CSH if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Tiggo 7 CSH has a fuel consumption of 2.4. Therefore, Tiggo 7 CSH is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while Tiggo 7 CSH has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 7 CSH uses Front Drive.