CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) vs CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
192 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075 mm
4395 mm
1969 mm
1795 mm
1716 mm
1562 mm
2930 mm
2655 mm
407 L
430 L
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
74 L
48 L
11.8 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
153 HP - 155 BHP
Automatic
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230 BHP
155 BHP
420 Nm
200 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GT (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX30 2.0L Elite 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.