CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
5075 mm
4810
1969 mm
1925
1716 mm
1742
2930 mm
2800
407 L
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
13
74 L
/
11.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
6
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
-
226 BHP - 273 BHP
254 - 254
Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230 BHP
254
420 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX9 2.5T GT (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GT (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX9 2.5T GT (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.