Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) vs 5008 1.6T Allure plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
206 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4620 mm
4641 mm
1910 mm
1844 mm
1780 mm
1646 mm
2738 mm
2840 mm
/
952 L
Fuel Economy
60 L
53 L
/
16.4 Km/L
/
16.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.6 L - 1.6 L
196 BHP
156 BHP - 180
Automatic
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
6 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
196 BHP
165 BHP
325 Nm
240 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
5008 1.6T Allure plus
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick5008 1.6T Allure plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) if you care more about power; choose 5008 1.6T Allure plus if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2738 mm, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus has a wheelbase of 2840 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5008 1.6T Allure plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus uses Front Wheel Drive.