CarteaCompare CarsDargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) vs X95 1.6T

Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) vs X95 1.6T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

185 km/h

/

4

/

1598 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4620 mm

4858 mm

1910 mm

1925 mm

1780 mm

1780 mm

2738 mm

2855 mm

/

5 Doors

/

210 mm

Fuel Economy

60 L

57 L

/

12.3 Km/L

/

12.3 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.6 L

196 BHP

197 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

196 BHP

197 BHP

325 Nm

290 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • X95 1.6T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) if you care more about price; choose X95 1.6T if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

VS

Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

VS

Subaru | OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD

Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

VS

Peugeot | 5008 1.6T Active Plus

Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

VS

Peugeot | 5008 1.6T Allure plus

Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T Allure

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while X95 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2738 mm, while X95 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2855 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X95 1.6T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive, while X95 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.