Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs G318 Standard Comparison

Car Information

/

220

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1590 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4590 mm

5010

1900 mm

1985

1685 mm

1895

2720 mm

2880

160 mm

/

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

16.3

57 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Smart Entry

/

✓

/

✓

/

Interior

✓

/

✓

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Electric

/

✓

/

✓

/

Standard

/

Safety

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Infotainment

15.6

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Android LCD

/

✓

/

8

/

Transmission

/

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.6 L

1.5

154 - 197 BHP

252 BHP

6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic

DHT

Gasoline

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

LED

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.6 L

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

None

/

4

/

194 BHP

252 BHP

290 Nm

/

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • G318 Standard

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Modern and attractive exterior design
    • Integrated interior fittings
    • Excellent value for the price

    Negative

    • Engine performance needs improvement
    • Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
    • The suspension is solid off-road

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickG318 Standard

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about overall equipment; choose G318 Standard if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    VS

    Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    VS

    Honda | HR-V DX

    Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    VS

    Jetour | Dashing Luxury 1.6T

    Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    VS

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    Jetour | Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    VS

    Toyota | RAV4 LE 4X2 HEV

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13. Therefore, G318 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive, while G318 Standard uses No data.