Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs HR-V DX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1590 cc
1498cc
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4590 mm
/
1900 mm
/
1685 mm
/
2720 mm
/
160 mm
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
/
57 L
40
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
/
/
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
8
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
8
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.6 L
1.5 L - 1.8 L
154 - 197 BHP
119 - 140 BHP
6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.6 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
4
194 BHP
119
290 Nm
145
/
Naturally Aspirated
/
1.5L i-VTEC
/
10.6:1
/
DOHC IN VTC+IN-VTEC
/
87.7
/
6600
/
4300
/
i-VTEC
/
PGM-FI 电喷
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dashing 1.6L Turbo
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
HR-V DX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Power Outlet
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Rear Crumple Zone
- Front Crumple Zone
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Front and Rear Crumple Zone
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Seatbelt pretensioner
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about price; choose HR-V DX if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while HR-V DX has a fuel consumption of 5.35. Therefore, HR-V DX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while HR-V DX has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive, while HR-V DX uses Front Drive.