DBX 4.0T (707 Edition) vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
310 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5039 mm
4490 mm
2050 mm
1874 mm
1680 mm
1613 mm
3060 mm
2750 mm
632 L
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
/
85 L
/
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0 L
/
542 BHP - 707 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
707 BHP
305 BHP
900 Nm
680 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
DBX 4.0T (707 Edition)
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DBX 4.0T (707 Edition) if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DBX 4.0T (707 Edition) has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DBX 4.0T (707 Edition) has a wheelbase of 3060 mm, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DBX 4.0T (707 Edition), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DBX 4.0T (707 Edition) uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.