CarteaCompare CarsDefender 90 X (P400) vs EHS9 Luxury 6 Seater

Defender 90 X (P400) vs EHS9 Luxury 6 Seater Comparison

Car Information

/

160+245

/

≥500

/

99

Engine / Motor

208 km/h

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

6

5 Doors

5 Doors

4583 mm

5209 mm

2008 mm

2010 mm

1969 mm

1713 mm

2587 mm

3110 mm

397 L

438 L

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

90 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather NAPPA+Alcantara

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

16.2

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Intelligent damper control system

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

/

300 BHP - 635

429 BHP - 543 BHP

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 8 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Engine

3.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

400 BHP

429 BHP

550 Nm

300+450

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

8

/

options.Lithium-Ion

/

160+245 kW

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 90 X (P400)

    • EHS9 Luxury 6 Seater

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickDefender 90 X (P400)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 90 X (P400) if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Luxury 6 Seater if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.5T GR-Sport

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2023 3.5T GR-Sport

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Porsche | Macan Turbo Electric

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar I Pace 2022 EV400 HSE (AWD)

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln Navigator 2023 3.5T Reserve (AWD)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 X (P400) has a fuel consumption of 10, while EHS9 Luxury 6 Seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 90 X (P400) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while EHS9 Luxury 6 Seater has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Luxury 6 Seater, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 X (P400) uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Luxury 6 Seater uses All Wheel Drive.