CarteaCompare CarsDefender 90 X (P400) vs Macan Turbo Electric

Defender 90 X (P400) vs Macan Turbo Electric Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

208 km/h

260 km/h

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4583 mm

4784 mm

2008 mm

2152 mm

1969 mm

1622 mm

2587 mm

2893 mm

397 L

480 L

/

187 m

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

90 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

14

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

2.0 L - 3.6 L

300 BHP - 635

245 BHP - 635 BHP

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Diesel & Electric & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 8 Seater

5 Seater

Engine

3.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

400 BHP

635 BHP

550 Nm

1130 Nm

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

11

/

options.Lithium-ion

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Defender 90 X (P400)

    • Macan Turbo Electric

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Sensor Rear Tailgate
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Positive

    • Exceptional driving experience with high precision
    • Luxurious interior design with high-quality materials
    • The attractiveness of the Porsche brand

    Negative

    • Limited interior space for seats and trunk
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Low suitability for everyday practical use

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickDefender 90 X (P400)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Defender 90 X (P400) if you care more about price; choose Macan Turbo Electric if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.5T GR-Sport

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2023 3.5T GR-Sport

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Porsche | Macan Turbo Electric

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar I Pace 2022 EV400 HSE (AWD)

    Land Rover | Defender 90 X (P400)

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln Navigator 2023 3.5T Reserve (AWD)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 X (P400) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Macan Turbo Electric has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Defender 90 X (P400) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Macan Turbo Electric has a wheelbase of 2893 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Macan Turbo Electric, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 X (P400) uses All Wheel Drive, while Macan Turbo Electric uses All Wheel Drive.