Defender 90 X (P400) vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
208 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4583 mm
4785
2008 mm
1930
1969 mm
1625
2587 mm
2880
397 L
/
/
20"
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
90 L
56
10 Km/L
/
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
/
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5 L
1.5L
300 BHP - 635
496 hp
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
AT & single-speed AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 8 Seater
5
Engine
3.0 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
400 BHP
496 hp
550 Nm
675
/
Turbocharge
/
365
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Defender 90 X (P400)
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Defender 90 X (P400) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 X (P400) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Defender 90 X (P400) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 X (P400) uses All Wheel Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.