DFSK C35 Standard vs Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
140
150 km/h
1499
/
Dimensions
2
2 Seater
14"
/
4500
5413 mm
1680
2050 mm
1985
2254 mm
3050
3450 mm
800
/
/
options.11,500 L
Fuel Economy
15.5
13.3 Km/L
55L
90 L
/
13.3 Km/L
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson independent suspension
/
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
/
Engine
1.5
2.2 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Naturally Aspirated
/
114
130 BHP
148
320 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.2 L - 2.2 L
/
130 BHP - 140
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Diesel
/
TBD
/
2 - 2
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C35 Standard
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBoxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about fuel economy; choose Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, DFSK C35 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) has a wheelbase of 3450 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive, while Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) uses Front Wheel Drive.