CarteaCompare CarsDFSK C35 Standard vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

DFSK C35 Standard vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

140

160

1499

/

/

4

Dimensions

2

13 Seater

14"

/

4500

5380

1680

1880

1985

2285

3050

3110

800

/

/

9800

Fuel Economy

15.5

9.5

55L

70

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

5MT

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Macpherson independent suspension

/

MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension

/

/

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Drum

/

185/80R14

/

185/80R14

/

/

Key Spec

1.5

2.5 L - 3.5 L

114

88 BHP - 277

5MT

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2

3 - 13 Seater

Engine

1.5

2.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Naturally Aspirated

/

114

149 BHP

148

240

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • DFSK C35 Standard

    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
  • Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickToyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about fuel economy; choose Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

DFSK | DFSK C35 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

DFSK | DFSK C35 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

DFSK | DFSK C35 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

DFSK | DFSK C35 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

DFSK | DFSK C35 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, DFSK C35 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) uses Rear Wheel Drive.