DFSK C35 Standard vs Fiorino 1.4L Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
140
156 km/h
1499
/
Dimensions
2
2 Seater
14"
/
4500
3864 mm
1680
1716 mm
1985
1721 mm
3050
2513 mm
800
/
/
options.2,800 L
Fuel Economy
15.5
15.9 Km/L
55L
45 L
/
15.9 Km/L
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson independent suspension
/
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.4 L
114
75 BHP
5MT
Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2
2 Seater
Engine
1.5
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
114
75 BHP
148
118 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C35 Standard
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Fiorino 1.4L Standard
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDFSK C35 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about price; choose Fiorino 1.4L Standard if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Fiorino 1.4L Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.29. Therefore, Fiorino 1.4L Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while Fiorino 1.4L Standard has a wheelbase of 2513 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DFSK C35 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive, while Fiorino 1.4L Standard uses Front Wheel Drive.