DFSK C35 Standard vs Forthing V3 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
140
/
1499
/
Dimensions
2
/
14"
14"
4500
4500
1680
1710
1985
2000
3050
2850
800
/
/
Sliding Door
Fuel Economy
15.5
14
55L
55
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Fabric
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
5MT
5MT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Drive
Macpherson independent suspension
MacPherson
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
Leaf Spring
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.5
114
125
5MT
5MT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2
TBD
Engine
1.5
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
114
125
148
150
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C35 Standard
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Forthing V3
- Parking sensor rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickForthing V3
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about fuel economy; choose Forthing V3 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Forthing V3 has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, DFSK C35 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while Forthing V3 has a wheelbase of 2850. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DFSK C35 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive, while Forthing V3 uses Front Drive.