DFSK C35 Standard vs Master 2.3T Panel Van (L1H1) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
140
/
1499
/
Dimensions
2
3 Seater
14"
/
4500
5048 mm
1680
2070 mm
1985
2307 mm
3050
3182 mm
800
/
/
options.8,000 L
Fuel Economy
15.5
/
55L
100 L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson independent suspension
/
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
/
Key Spec
1.5
2.3 L - 2.3 L
114
125 - 125
5MT
6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel
TBD
TBD
2
3 - 3
Engine
1.5
2.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Naturally Aspirated
/
114
125 BHP
148
310 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C35 Standard
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Master 2.3T Panel Van (L1H1)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMaster 2.3T Panel Van (L1H1)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about overall equipment; choose Master 2.3T Panel Van (L1H1) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Master 2.3T Panel Van (L1H1) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while Master 2.3T Panel Van (L1H1) has a wheelbase of 3182 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Master 2.3T Panel Van (L1H1), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive, while Master 2.3T Panel Van (L1H1) uses Front Wheel Drive.