Dodge Challenger 2023 3.6L GT vs Challenger 3.6L GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
200 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5027
5027 mm
1923
1923 mm
1460
1460 mm
2950
2950 mm
459
459 L
/
2 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.8
9.8 Km/L
70
70 L
/
9.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
Driver Seat
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
300 BHP - 797 BHP
300 BHP - 797 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 5 Seater
2 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.6 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
305 BHP
305 BHP
363
363 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dodge Challenger 2023 3.6L GT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Challenger 3.6L GT
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChallenger 3.6L GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dodge Challenger 2023 3.6L GT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Challenger 3.6L GT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dodge Challenger 2023 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.2, while Challenger 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dodge Challenger 2023 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 2950, while Challenger 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dodge Challenger 2023 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Challenger 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.