Dodge Challenger 2024 3.6L SXT vs Volvo C70 2012 T5 Comparison
Car Information
6.6
/
Engine / Motor
200
235
6
5
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
5027
4615
1923
1836
1460
1400
2950
2640
459
404
Fuel Economy
9.8
14.9
70
62
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
2.5 L
300 BHP - 797 BHP
230 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
305 BHP
230 BHP
363
320
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dodge Challenger 2024 3.6L SXT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Volvo C70 2012 T5
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- First Aid Kit
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVolvo C70 2012 T5
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dodge Challenger 2024 3.6L SXT if you care more about interior space; choose Volvo C70 2012 T5 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dodge Challenger 2024 3.6L SXT has a fuel consumption of 10.2, while Volvo C70 2012 T5 has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Volvo C70 2012 T5 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dodge Challenger 2024 3.6L SXT has a wheelbase of 2950, while Volvo C70 2012 T5 has a wheelbase of 2640. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dodge Challenger 2024 3.6L SXT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dodge Challenger 2024 3.6L SXT uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Volvo C70 2012 T5 uses Front Wheel Drive.