E 200 vs CT5 V 3.0T Comparison

Car Information

7.5

/

Engine / Motor

240

250 km/h

/

6

/

2998 cc

/

American

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4949

4922 mm

1880

2039 mm

1480

1452 mm

2961

2946 mm

/

4 Doors

/

336 L

/

102 m

Fuel Economy

13.7

8 Km/L

/

64 L

/

8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

15

Transmission

9-speed automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.0 L

3.0 L - 6.2 L

204 BHP - 402

360 BHP - 668 BHP

7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic

10-speed automatic transmission

Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 5 Seater

4 Seater - 5

Engine

2.0 T

3.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

2.0 L turbocharged 4-cyl

/

204 HP

360 BHP

320

550 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • E 200

    • CT5 V 3.0T

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Sensor Rear Tailgate
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickCT5 V 3.0T

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose E 200 if you care more about fuel economy; choose CT5 V 3.0T if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | E 200

    VS

    Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo Giulia 2021 Quadrifoglio

    Mercedes Benz | E 200

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | CLA 35 AMG 4MATIC

    Mercedes Benz | E 200

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln Continental 2018 3.0L Reserve (Tech Pack) AWD Full Option

    Mercedes Benz | E 200

    VS

    Hongqi | H9

    Mercedes Benz | E 200

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi H9 3.0T Executive 4WD (Two Tone)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, E 200 has a fuel consumption of 7.3, while CT5 V 3.0T has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, E 200 is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, E 200 has a wheelbase of 2961 , while CT5 V 3.0T has a wheelbase of 2946 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E 200, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 200 uses Rear Drive, while CT5 V 3.0T uses Rear Wheel Drive.