E 53 AMG vs L5 6.0 V12 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4,959
5555 mm
2,065
2018 mm
1,468
1578 mm
2,961
3435 mm
Fuel Economy
/
5 Km/L
60
105 L
/
5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
6.0 L
367 - 449
402 BHP
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
7 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
6.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
449
402 BHP
560
550 Nm
Motor
480
/
Lithium-ion/21.2
/
Exterior
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E 53 AMG
L5 6.0 V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickL5 6.0 V12
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E 53 AMG if you care more about fuel economy; choose L5 6.0 V12 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E 53 AMG has a fuel consumption of 1.0–0.9, while L5 6.0 V12 has a fuel consumption of 20. Therefore, E 53 AMG is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E 53 AMG has a wheelbase of 2,961, while L5 6.0 V12 has a wheelbase of 3435 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, L5 6.0 V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 53 AMG uses No data, while L5 6.0 V12 uses All Wheel Drive.