E:HEV EX-L vs Camry 3.5L Sport (298 HP) Comparison

Car Information

7.5

/

Engine / Motor

/

235 km/h

/

6

/

2490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4971

4905 mm

1862

1840 mm

1449

1445 mm

2830

2824 mm

573

427 L

/

4 Doors

Fuel Economy

/

7 Km/L

/

60 L

/

7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

10

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

9

/

/

/

/

9

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

146 BHP - 204

176 BHP - 298 BHP

Automatic

8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & CVT

Hybrid

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

2.0

3.5 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

204

298 BHP

152

/

6100

/

335

356 Nm

4500

/

/

V

/

4

Motor

152

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • E:HEV EX-L

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Collision Safety Cut-Out
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Camry 3.5L Sport (298 HP)

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Reliability and durability of high performance
  • Riding comfort and roomy interior design
  • Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs

Negative

  • Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
  • Traditional exterior and interior design
  • Lack of sportsmanship in control

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCamry 3.5L Sport (298 HP)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose E:HEV EX-L if you care more about interior space; choose Camry 3.5L Sport (298 HP) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Honda | E:HEV EX-L

VS

Exeed | ES REEV PRO

Honda | E:HEV EX-L

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Azera 2019 3.5L V6 High

Honda | E:HEV EX-L

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi H6 Flagship

Honda | E:HEV EX-L

VS

BYD | Seal Design

Honda | E:HEV EX-L

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Azera 2021 3.5L V6 High

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, E:HEV EX-L has a fuel consumption of No data, while Camry 3.5L Sport (298 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, E:HEV EX-L has a wheelbase of 2830, while Camry 3.5L Sport (298 HP) has a wheelbase of 2824 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E:HEV EX-L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E:HEV EX-L uses No data, while Camry 3.5L Sport (298 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.